Wednesday, March 04, 2015

DN missar visionens kärna

Inte helt oväntat så har DN missat själva kärnpunkten i EUs föreslagna energiunion, nämligen att effektviseringen går före (Effiiciency first), när de tar upp den i sin ledare i måndags. De nämner den inte ens.

Så låt oss kolla EUs pressrelease. Jo där står det:

The Energy Union means in particular:
Solidarity clause: reducing the dependence on single suppliers ....
Energy flows, as if it were a Fifth freedom: that of free flow of energy across borders - strictly enforcing the current rules…..
Energy efficiency first: fundamentally rethinking energy efficiency and treating it as an energy source in its own right so that it can compete on equal terms with generation capacity;
Transition to a low-carbon society that is built to last:ensuring that locally produced energy – including from renewables – can be absorbed easily ......

Och när DN skriver “Ytterligare motiv spelar in: USA:s skiffergasrevolution har gett landet ett industriellt försprång. EU behöver överbrygga gasgapet för att klara konkurrensen.” så kunde de gott ha kollat andra EU-dokument som visar att det inte är priset som avgör konkurrenskraften utan kostnaden. Effektivast vinner!

Finally, since steady energy intensity improvements have proven to be one of the best asset of the EU industry to maintain their competitiveness, the EU should maintain and perhaps intensify its policy to bolster the EU industry’s energy efficiency efforts

DN missar visionens kärna

Inte helt oväntat så har DN missat själva kärnpunkten i EUs föreslagna energiunion, nämligen att effektviseringen går före (Effiiciency first), när de tar upp den i sin ledare i måndags. De nämner den inte ens.

Så låt oss kolla EUs pressrelease. Jo där står det:

The Energy Union means in particular:
Solidarity clause: reducing the dependence on single suppliers ....
Energy flows, as if it were a Fifth freedom: that of free flow of energy across borders - strictly enforcing the current rules…..
Energy efficiency first: fundamentally rethinking energy efficiency and treating it as an energy source in its own right so that it can compete on equal terms with generation capacity;
Transition to a low-carbon society that is built to last:ensuring that locally produced energy – including from renewables – can be absorbed easily ......

Och när DN skriver “Ytterligare motiv spelar in: USA:s skiffergasrevolution har gett landet ett industriellt försprång. EU behöver överbrygga gasgapet för att klara konkurrensen.” så kunde de gott ha kollat andra EU-dokument som visar att det inte är priset som avgör konkurrenskraften utan kostnaden. Effektivast vinner!

Finally, since steady energy intensity improvements have proven to be one of the best asset of the EU industry to maintain their competitiveness, the EU should maintain and perhaps intensify its policy to bolster the EU industry’s energy efficiency efforts

Läs mer

Månadsindelade arkiv